data-sharing-decision-tree issueshttps://git.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/open-science/community/data-sharing-decision-tree/-/issues2021-11-02T23:00:28+00:00https://git.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/open-science/community/data-sharing-decision-tree/-/issues/23[new supporting resource] Revise AP08 (MEG)2021-11-02T23:00:28+00:00Cassandra Gould van Praagcassandra.gouldvanpraag@psych.ox.ac.uk[new supporting resource] Revise AP08 (MEG)Milestone 04: new ethics documentation draftedhttps://git.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/open-science/community/data-sharing-decision-tree/-/issues/22[new supporting resource] Revise AP03 (EEG)2021-11-02T23:00:14+00:00Cassandra Gould van Praagcassandra.gouldvanpraag@psych.ox.ac.uk[new supporting resource] Revise AP03 (EEG)Milestone 04: new ethics documentation draftedhttps://git.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/open-science/community/data-sharing-decision-tree/-/issues/21[new supporting resource] Revise AP17 (MRI)2021-11-02T23:00:00+00:00Cassandra Gould van Praagcassandra.gouldvanpraag@psych.ox.ac.uk[new supporting resource] Revise AP17 (MRI)Revise CUREC approved procedure to extend the detail on open data sharing.
As per issue #14, current wording in AP17 is considered to be sufficient for sharing data on our open repository. We will, however, submit an amendment containin...Revise CUREC approved procedure to extend the detail on open data sharing.
As per issue #14, current wording in AP17 is considered to be sufficient for sharing data on our open repository. We will, however, submit an amendment containing further details, as best practice in transparency and courtesy to participants.
Amendments will be made in:
- [ap17-revised-PIS](https://git.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/open-science/community/data-sharing-decision-tree/-/blob/master/docs/new-supporting-resources/Revised_AP17-PIS.docx)
- [ap17-revised-consent](https://git.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/open-science/community/data-sharing-decision-tree/-/blob/master/docs/new-supporting-resources/Revised_AP17-consent.docx)
- [ap17-revised-procedure](https://git.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/open-science/community/data-sharing-decision-tree/-/blob/master/docs/new-supporting-resources/Revised_AP17-procedure.docx)Milestone 04: new ethics documentation draftedCassandra Gould van Praagcassandra.gouldvanpraag@psych.ox.ac.ukCassandra Gould van Praagcassandra.gouldvanpraag@psych.ox.ac.ukhttps://git.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/open-science/community/data-sharing-decision-tree/-/issues/16[new supporting resource] Technical Development SOP update?2021-11-02T22:56:32+00:00Cassandra Gould van Praagcassandra.gouldvanpraag@psych.ox.ac.uk[new supporting resource] Technical Development SOP update?[WIN Technical Development SOP](https://sharepoint.nexus.ox.ac.uk/sites/NDCN/FMRIB/Shared%20Documents/SOP_Technical_Development_Scanning.pdf#search=technical%20development) is used for scanning on physics projects.
SOP Number: OHBA_009_...[WIN Technical Development SOP](https://sharepoint.nexus.ox.ac.uk/sites/NDCN/FMRIB/Shared%20Documents/SOP_Technical_Development_Scanning.pdf#search=technical%20development) is used for scanning on physics projects.
SOP Number: OHBA_009_V1; 004-V4 (FMRIB)
SOP Title: Ethical Considerations for Technical Development Scans
> [This SOP] describe circumstances in which MR scanning of human volunteers is permissible for technical development purposes, without the need for explicit NRES/CUREC ethical approval, and to describe the procedures that should be followed in these cases.
Does this need to be updated to allow data sharing via XNAT? Relevant wording around data sharing:
> 4.1 Technical Development Scans
> Examples of technical developments, where it has been advised that ethics committee approval is not required include:
> **1. Evaluating, testing or fixing a sequence whose use will be for other studies running under their own ethics approval.**
> - **Data collected will not be published**.
> 2. Acquiring a few data sets for demonstration of an image analysis methodology or optimising sequence parameters.
> - Data may be published as proof of method.
> 3. Developing and validating a new imaging sequence.
> - Validation data may be published.
> 4. Testing a device for use in the MRI scanner, including radiofrequency coils and stimulus delivery equipment.
> - Data may be published.
> 4.2 Training scans
> A training scan is one performed for the purposes of training other researchers or scanner operators in imaging techniques, and should be logged accordingly. Individual subject log sheets should still include these scans, which count towards the total.
> - **Data will not be published**
> 6.5 Data storage and protection
> Data storage will be on a password-protected computer. **Any data that is shared outside the University of Oxford must be completely anonymised and no information about the subject disclosed.**
Actions / suggested update options:
- [ ] 6.5 replace "completely anonymised" with "de-identified"
- [ ] Add a section on open data sharing, copying the proposed amended wording to the AP17 (see issue #14)
- [ ] System for identifying which basis (from the above) data were collected so this can be audited when preparing the data for sharing.Milestone 04: new ethics documentation draftedhttps://git.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/open-science/community/data-sharing-decision-tree/-/issues/14[task] Do we need separate ethics for this repository? - Stakeholder feedback2021-11-02T22:55:55+00:00Cassandra Gould van Praagcassandra.gouldvanpraag@psych.ox.ac.uk[task] Do we need separate ethics for this repository? - Stakeholder feedback## Clare O'Donoghue + @cassag (19/08/21)
CUREC MRI [approved procedure](https://researchsupport.admin.ox.ac.uk/governance/ethics/resources/ap) (AP17)
- Consent form: "I agree for research data collected in this study to be **given to re...## Clare O'Donoghue + @cassag (19/08/21)
CUREC MRI [approved procedure](https://researchsupport.admin.ox.ac.uk/governance/ethics/resources/ap) (AP17)
- Consent form: "I agree for research data collected in this study to be **given to researchers**, including those working outside of the UK and the EU, to be used in other research studies. I give permission for data from this study to be used in publication. I understand that any data and/or brain images of me that leave the Centre will be de-identified."
- PIS: "If applicable: I/We would like your permission to use de-identified data in future studies, and to **share data with other researchers (e.g. in online databases). All personal information that could identify you will be removed or changed before information is shared with other researchers** or results are made public."
- **Is the wording above sufficient?**
[Ethics decision tree](https://researchsupport.admin.ox.ac.uk/governance/ethics/apply)
- Data will not be anonymous
- Some participants will be recruited into WIN studies via NHS, however they will be recruited into the database via the study, not directly via NHS.
WIN Ethics check list will need updating
How will we confirm consent is in place before making data public? Easiest if it is machine readable, but then easier to link to WIN Scan ID.Milestone 04: new ethics documentation draftedCassandra Gould van Praagcassandra.gouldvanpraag@psych.ox.ac.ukCassandra Gould van Praagcassandra.gouldvanpraag@psych.ox.ac.ukhttps://git.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/open-science/community/data-sharing-decision-tree/-/issues/11[New supporting resource] Create WIN template participant information sheets ...2021-11-02T22:55:34+00:00Cassandra Gould van Praagcassandra.gouldvanpraag@psych.ox.ac.uk[New supporting resource] Create WIN template participant information sheets and consent forms for data sharing[Incorporate Open Brain Consent suggestions](https://open-brain-consent.readthedocs.io/en/stable/gdpr/ultimate_gdpr.html#english) into WIN data sharing participant information sheets and consent forms.[Incorporate Open Brain Consent suggestions](https://open-brain-consent.readthedocs.io/en/stable/gdpr/ultimate_gdpr.html#english) into WIN data sharing participant information sheets and consent forms.Milestone 04: new ethics documentation draftedCassandra Gould van Praagcassandra.gouldvanpraag@psych.ox.ac.ukCassandra Gould van Praagcassandra.gouldvanpraag@psych.ox.ac.uk