@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ These positions will be opporationalised by reference against the following desc
*Applicants who score mostly 3s are clearly ready, goal-oriented, interested in contributing to the project, and excited to learn from others in the programme and community.*
The reviewer will provide a 1-2 sentence summary about the application to justify the scores received. They will also highlight any diversity characteristics which were disclosed. These will be combined with the "mostly 1s, 2s or 3s" decision above, and the reviewer will make a final decision as to whether they recommend the applicant for the programme ("Yes", "No", "Unsure"). Any applications which are graded as "Unsure" will be put to another member of the Steering Group for evaluation following the same rubric. Six to ten applicants will be invited to participate in the programme.
The reviewer will provide a 1-2 sentence summary about the application to justify the scores received. They will also highlight any diversity characteristics which were disclosed. These will be combined with the "mostly 1s, 2s or 3s" decision above, and the reviewer will make a final decision as to whether they recommend the applicant for the programme ("Yes", "No", "Unsure"). Any applications which are graded as "Unsure" will be put to another member of the Steering Group for evaluation following the same rubric. Four to six applicants will be invited to participate in the programme.