The jekyll-asciidoc plugin will take AsciiDoc markup like this:

	.A method that returns the string "Hello, world"
	[example]
	[source,ruby]
	----
	def hello
	  "Hello, world"
	end
	----

And produce HTML like this (syntax highlighting disabled):

	<div class="listingblock">
	  <div class="title">A method that returns the string "Hello, world"</div>
	  <div class="content">
	    <pre class="highlight"><code class="language-ruby" data-lang="ruby">def hello
	  "Hello, world"
	end</code></pre>
	  </div>
	</div>

Previously, because we were applying code block styling to the whole
listingblock, the title would be rendered as normal body text, inside
the code block, which did not look good.  With this change, it will
instead be rendered similarly to a Just The Docs rendered example —
the title will appear where the rendered example usually would.

Co-authored-by: Matt Wang <matt@matthewwang.me>

This is a catch-all PR that modernizes and updates our Stylelint config, and resolves all open issues. This is a pretty big change - so I want to update all of our related dependencies in lockstep.

In particular, this PR

- [x] updates stylelint to `v14`
- [x] adds in the standard stylelint config for SCSS (`stylelint-config-standard-scss`)
- [x] swaps out `stylelint-config-prettier` for `stylelint-config-prettier-scss`
- [x] ~~properly update `@primer`-related plugins:~~ completely remove `primer` from our configuration
- [x] autofix, manually resolve, or disable all newly-introduced lint errors; **I've avoided manually resolving errors that would be a behavioural change**
- [x] re-runs `npm run format`

See the "next steps" section on some extra thoughts on disabling errors.

(implicitly, I'm also using node 16/the new package-lock format).

### disabling rules and next steps

I've introduced several new disabled rules. Let me quickly explain what's going on; there are two categories of rules I've disabled:

1. rules that were temporary disables; they were frequent enough that I couldn't manually resolve them, but should be simple. **I plan on opening issues to re-enable each of these rules**, just after this PR
    - `declaration-block-no-redundant-longhand-properties`: this is just tedious and error-prone
    - `no-descending-specificity`: this one is tricky since it could have impacts on the cascade (though that seems unlikely)
    - `scss/no-global-function-names`: I think we need to [import map and then use `map.get`](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64210390/sass-map-get-doesnt-work-map-get-does-what-gives), but I'll leave this as out of scope for now
2. rules that are long-term disables; due to the SASS-based nature of our theme, I think we'll keep these in limbo
    - `alpha-value-notation` causes problems with SASS using the `modern` syntax - literals like `50%` are not properly interpolated, and they cause formatting issues on the site
    - `color-function-notation` also causes problems with SASS, but in this case the `modern` syntax breaks SASS compilation; we're not alone (see this [SO post](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71805735/error-function-rgb-is-missing-argument-green-in-sass)). 

In addition, we have many inline `stylelint-disable` comments. I'd open a separate issue to audit them, especially since I think some disables are unnecessary.

### on Primer 

**note: there hasn't been much other discussion, so I'm going to remove primer's stylelint config.**

If I do add `@primer/stylelint-config`, I get *a ton* of errors about now using `@primer`'s in-built SCSS variables. I imagine that we probably won't want to use these presets (though I could be wrong). In that case, I think we could either:

1. disable all of those rules
4. not use `@primer/stylelint-config`, since we're not actually using primer, and shift back to the standard SCSS config provided by Stylelint

~~Any thoughts here? I also don't have the original context as to why we do use the primer rules, perhaps @pmarsceill can chime in?~~

without overflow-x: auto; a very long line of code will overflow the box and look awkward


Co-authored-by: Matt Wang <matt@matthewwang.me>

Closes #825


Co-authored-by: Matt Wang <matt@matthewwang.me>

I have a site whose content is written in AsciiDoc, using the [jekyll-asciidoc][] plugin.

Just the Docs works great, but there are just two minor styling glitches I've noticed:

The first is that Just the Docs' CSS doesn't understand the code block markup jekyll-asciidoc produces.  It's not too different though, so it's very easily fixed.

The second is that jekyll-asciidoc generates `div.sect(𝑛 − 1)` elements around headings of type `h𝑛`, that enclose all the heading and all the content after it until the next heading of greater or equal rank.

This means that headings are _always_ first children in AsciiDoc output, which meant the wrong margins were applied to most headings. To fix this, we need to only reduce the margin of first-child headings nested directly below the .main-content element, and headings nested directly below AsciiDoc `.sect𝑛` elements that are themselves first children.

With these two small changes, my site looks perfect, and the styles look exactly the same as on Just the Docs' own documentation.

[jekyll-asciidoc]: https://github.com/asciidoctor/jekyll-asciidoc

Fix #685
- Wrap scss file in comments with `{% raw %}` and `{% endraw %}` tags

Co-authored-by: Matt Wang <matt@matthewwang.me>

This PR combines (and resolves conflicts between) #448, #463, #466, #494, #495, #496, #498, and #572. 

The main aim is to facilitate use of several of the implemented features _together_, when using the fork as a remote theme. It should also simplify merging the included PRs into a future release.

The branch [combination-rec-nav](https://github.com/pdmosses/just-the-docs/tree/combination-rec-nav) adds [multi-level navigation](https://github.com/pmarsceill/just-the-docs/pull/462) and (NEW:) [sibling links](https://github.com/pmarsceill/just-the-docs/pull/394) to the branch used for this PR. It includes updated [documentation for the navigation structure](https://pdmosses.github.io/just-the-docs/docs/navigation-structure/), and reorganised and extended [navigation tests](https://pdmosses.github.io/just-the-docs/tests/navigation/). The documentation and the tests can be browsed at the (temporary) [website published from the combination-rec-nav branch](https://pdmosses.github.io/just-the-docs/

).

_Caveat:_ The changes to v0.3.3 in this PR and #462 have not yet been reviewed or approved, and may need updating before merging into a release of the theme. If you use a branch from a PR as a remote theme, there is a risk of such updates affecting your website. Moreover, these branches are likely to be deleted after they have been merged. To avoid  such problems, you could copy the branch that you want to use to your own fork of the theme.

Co-authored-by: Matt Wang <matt@matthewwang.me>

Fix #417

- Avoid appearance of dark border around visited code links in Safari.

Optimised CSS selectors.
Changed markup in `linenos-test` to inhibit line numbers appearing in YAML examples when testing code fences.

The additions to `_config.yml` go together with the changes to `code.scss`,
to facilitate adjusttments by users. See `docs/linenos-test` for the details.
The CSS code has been significantly refactored and simplified,
and seems to produce sensible results (at least on Safari and Firefox).

Removed some comments and layout

Produces sensible (but not perfect) results from different kinds of highlight markup.
The CSS code needs a major refactoring to eliminate duplication and superflous lines.

Fixed more layout details. Numbers of selectors still to be fixed.

Correected layout, order, values.

The added examples in `docs/index-test.md` extend the previous examplees of highlighting, documenting the required inout.